Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

Order. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 19 adopted as order of the court. Commissioners decision denying plaintiff's application for benefits affirmed. Judge James G. Carr on 2/29/2016. (G,D)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

James Webb,

Case No. 3:15CV59
Plaintiff
v.

ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant

This is a Social Security case in which the plaintiff, James Webb, appeals from the
Commissioner’s denial of his application for benefits.
An administrative law judge found that, though Webb suffers from multiple severe
impairments, he nevertheless has the residual functional capacity to perform light work. 20 C.F.R.
§§ 404.1567(b) and 416.967(b).
Pending is Magistrate Judge McHargh’s Report and Recommendation, which recommends
I affirm that decision. (Doc. 19).
Webb has not filed an objection to the R&R and has thus waived his right to a “de novo
determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report.” Amison v. Legg, 2015 WL
853526, *1 (N.D. Ohio) (Lioi, J.); see also Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d
1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (same).

It is, therefore,
ORDERED THAT:
1.

The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) be, and the same
hereby is, adopted as the order of the court; and

2.

The Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiff’s application for benefits be, and the
same hereby is, affirmed.

So ordered.
/s/ James G. Carr
Sr. U.S. District Judge