Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security
Memorandum Order: I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision of no disability is not supported by substantial evidence. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. re 24 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/24/2017. (S,AL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case No. 15-cv-2314
Commissioner of Social Security,
Pending before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H.
Baughman, Jr. filed on December 28, 2016, in the above-captioned action. (Doc. No. 24). Under
the relevant statute:
Within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and
Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written
objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. §
636(b)(1). On January 11, 2017, the Commissioner filed a response to the Report and
Recommendation indicating it had no objections. (Doc. No. 25).
Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and in the absence
of any objections, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court.
The Commissioner’s decision of no disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly,
the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
s/Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?