Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

Memorandum Order: I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision of no disability is not supported by substantial evidence. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. re 24 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/24/2017. (S,AL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

Christina Madrigal,

Case No. 15-cv-2314
Plaintiff

v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
Pending before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H.
Baughman, Jr. filed on December 28, 2016, in the above-captioned action. (Doc. No. 24). Under
the relevant statute:
Within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and
Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written
objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. §
636(b)(1). On January 11, 2017, the Commissioner filed a response to the Report and
Recommendation indicating it had no objections. (Doc. No. 25).
Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and in the absence
of any objections, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court.
The Commissioner’s decision of no disability is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly,
the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

So Ordered.
s/Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge