Beadle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order. I adopt the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. re 15 Report and Recommendation. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 12/16/2016. (SG,D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Terry Lynn Beadle,
Case No. 3:16-cv-313
Commissioner of Social Security,
Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen Burke, filed on
November 3, 2016, recommending the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny
Plaintiff Terry Lynn Beadle’s application for disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security
income under the Social Security Act, be affirmed. (Doc. No. 15).
Under the relevant statute, “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party
may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided
by rules of court.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001). In
this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.
The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation
constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report.
Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.
1987) (“only those specific objections to the magistrate’s report made to the district court will be
preserved for appellate review”).
Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, I adopt the Report
and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The decision of the
Commissioner is affirmed.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?