Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
19
Memorandum Opinion: I adopt the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation. re 17 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/29/2017. (SG,D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Ronald D. Jackson,
Case No. 3:16-cv-757
Plaintiff
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
Before me is the January 26, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Kathleen B. Burke recommending the Commissioner’s final decision to deny Plaintiff’s s application
for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income be reversed and remanded. (Doc.
No. 17).
Under the relevant statute, “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party
may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided
by rules of court.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001). In
this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.
The Defendant states it will not be filing objections to the Report and Recommendation.
(Doc. No. 18).
Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, I adopt the Report
and Recommendation (Doc. No. 17) in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The decision of the
Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge
Burke’s Report and Recommendation.
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?