Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

Memorandum Opinion: the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and the matter dismissed. re 16 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 5/8/2017. (S,AL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Mimpsi Hamilton, Case No. 16-cv-1083 Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert filed on April 5, 2017, in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 16). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived. United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and neither party has filed objections. The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and the matter dismissed. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?