King v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

Memorandum Opinion: the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and the matter dismissed. re 12 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 5/8/2017. (S,AL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Mark E. King, Case No. 16-cv-1184 Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg filed on March 23, 2017, in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 12). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived. United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citations omitted); see also 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and neither party has objected. The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and the matter dismissed. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?