Nuhfer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

Memorandum Opinion: I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. re 13 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 9/29/2017. (S,AL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Amy Lee Nuhfer, Case No. 16-cv-1294 Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg filed on May 19, 2017, in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 13). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived. United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. (Doc. No. 13). Accordingly, the ALJ’s decision, properly evaluating the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating counselor, is affirmed and the complaint is dismissed. (Doc. No. 1). So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?