Theis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, (Doc. No. 16), in its entirety as the Order of the Court, and affirm the Commissioners decision. re 16 Report and Recommendation. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/26/2019. (SG,D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Tina Louise Theis,

Case No. 3:17-cv-1866
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Before me is the August 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J.
Limbert, recommending I affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the
application of Plaintiff Tina Louise Theis for Supplemental Security Income. (Doc. No. 16).
Under federal law, “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may
serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by
rules of court.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.
The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the Report and
Recommendation. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also
Walters, 638 F.2d at 950 (6th Cir. 1981); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370,
1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (“only those specific objections to the magistrate’s report made to the district
court will be preserved for appellate review”).

Following review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, I adopt the Report
and Recommendation, (Doc. No. 16), in its entirety as the Order of the Court, and affirm the
Commissioner’s decision.
So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge

2