Kramer v. Schweitzer

Filing 36

Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/25/2021. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hendersons Report and Recommendation and DENIES Kramers habeas corpus petition. re 35 1 (S,KM)

Download PDF
Case: 3:17-cv-02181-JG Doc #: 36 Filed: 03/25/21 1 of 2. PageID #: 1666 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ROBERT RAY KRAMER, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN TOM SCHWEITZER, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : : CASE NO. 3:17-cv-02181 OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Docs. 1, 6-1, 35] JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: Petitioner Robert Ray Kramer petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C § 2254. 1 Under Local Rule 72.2(b), this case was automatically referred to a Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. 2 On March 8, 2021, Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that this Court deny Kramer’s habeas petition. 3 Any objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on March 22, 2021. 4 Neither party filed objections. Because neither party filed objections, the Court may adopt the Report and Recommendation without review. 5 Still, the Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and agrees with Magistrate Judge Henderson’s conclusions. 1 Doc. 1; Doc. 6-1. Local Rule 72.2(b). 3 Doc. 35. 4 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.3(b). 5 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–53 (1985); U.S. v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981). 2 Case: 3:17-cv-02181-JG Doc #: 36 Filed: 03/25/21 2 of 2. PageID #: 1667 Case No. 3:17-cv-02181 GWIN, J. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Henderson’s Report and Recommendation and DENIES Kramer’s habeas corpus petition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 25, 2021 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?