Young v. Management & Training Corporation et al
Filing
18
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Supplemental Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint are granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order, Motion to Stay Proceedings, Motion to Take Jud icial Notice, and Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Parties are denied without prejudice. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is also denied without prejudice. re 6 17 15 8 14 12 5 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/19/2018. (S,AL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Aaron E. Young,
Case No. 3:17-cv-02426
Plaintiff
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
Management & Training Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Before me are Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 5), and
Plaintiff’s Motion for Restraining Order (Doc. No. 6), Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 8),
Motion to Take Judicial Notice (Doc. No. 12), Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Parties (Doc. No. 14),
Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 15), and Supplemental Motion for Leave to
Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 17). Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s Motions (Doc Nos. 7, 16).
Pro se Plaintiff Aaron E. Young filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Marion
County Common Pleas Court against Management & Training Corporation (“MTC”), MTC Medical
LLC, North Central Correctional Complex (“NCCC”) Warden Neil Turner, NCCC Deputy Warden
Taggart Boyd, NCCC Deputy Warden Becky Joyce, NCCC Institutional Inspector Lori Shuler,
NCCC Major Ruben Quintero, NCCC Healthcare Administrator Vicky Donahue, NCCC Assistant
Healthcare Administrator April Ellinwood, NCCC Director of Nursing Deanna Croyle, NCCC Unit
Manager Administrator James Craig, NCCC Unknown Corrections Officers #1 and #2, John Does
#1 and #2, Jane Does #1 and #2, NCCC Unknown First Shift Captain, NCCC Unknown First
Shift Lieutenant, NCCC Unknown Deaf Service Coordinator, NCCC Case Manager Kea Smith,
NCCC Sergeant Benjamin Blankenship, and NCCC Unknown Nurses #1-3. In the Complaint,
Plaintiff alleges he was compelled to disclose his tuberculosis diagnosis within hearing distance of
other inmates in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants removed the action to
federal court based on federal question jurisdiction, and ask me to dismiss the Complaint for failure
to state a claim.
Plaintiff now seeks to modify his pleading. He filed two Motions for Leave to Amend the
Complaint (Doc. Nos. 15 and 17). These Motions are granted. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from
the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint which sets forth all of the claims against all the
Defendants he intends to include in this action. His Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Parties (Doc.
No. 14) is denied without prejudice as moot. An Amended Complaint takes the place of the original
Complaint. Plaintiff can therefore drop his claims against certain Defendants by simply not
asserting them in the Amended Complaint.
Furthermore, because Plaintiff has been granted leave to file an Amended Complaint,
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 5) is denied without prejudice as
moot.
Plaintiff also asks me to take judicial notice that he attempted to serve all of the Defendants
(Doc. No. 12). This Motion is denied as moot.
Plaintiff’s Motions requesting a restraining order (Doc. No. 6) and a stay of proceedings
(Doc. No. 8) concern matters that are outside the issues raised in the Complaint. They are denied
without prejudice.
2
Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 15) and
Supplemental Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 17) are granted. Plaintiff’s Motion
for Restraining Order (Doc. No. 6), Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 8), Motion to Take
Judicial Notice (Doc. No. 12), and Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Parties (Doc. No. 14) are denied
without prejudice. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 5) is also denied
without prejudice.
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?