Hutcherson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

Memorandum Opinion: I adopt Judge Parker's Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision is vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. re 16 Report and Recommendation. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 3/26/2019. (SG,D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Clinetta Hutcherson on behalf of M.V., Case No. 3:18-cv-592 Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker filed on January 28, 2019, in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 16). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived. United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed, and the Commissioner indicates she will not be filing objections. (Doc. No. 17). Following review of Judge Parker’s Report and Recommendation, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. When arriving at the decision, the Administrative Law Judge failed to apply proper legal standard, an error which was not harmless. Further, the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?