Reed v. Jagnow et al

Filing 10

Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order Requesting Payment of Court Cost is denied. (Related Doc # 8 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 9/8/2010. (P,J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DONNIE REED, PLAINTIFF, vs. BETTY H. JAGNOW, et al, DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:10CV0012 JUDGE SARA LIOI MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER On March 4, 2010, this Court dismissed Plaintiff pro se Donnie Reed=s Complaint on the grounds that he failed to state a cause of action under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. '' 1983, 1985. This matter is now before the Court upon the Plaintiff=s Motion to Vacate Order Requesting Payment of Court Cost. (ECF 8). A filing fee is required to cover the costs of opening and docketing a case. In addition, it serves to control the filing of frivolous actions. Capograsso v. State Farm Ins. Co., 2009 WL 2580432 * 1 (D. N. J., Aug. 18, 2009). A plaintiff is not guaranteed a trial just because a filing fee is paid. He cannot receive a refund because he was unsuccessful. Accordingly, Plaintiff=s Motion to Vacate Order Requesting Payment of Court Cost is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2010 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?