Baird et al v. Excel Industries et al

Filing 115

Memorandum Opinion and Order re 107 Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Baughman's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 107 . The claims against Defendants Dexter Automatic ProductsCompany; Kohler Co.; Active Exhaust Corp.; Engineered Fastener Company, Individually and d/b/a EFC International; and The Gates Corporation, aka The Gates Rubber Company are dismissed without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/14/2011. (JLG)

Download PDF
PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JASON BAIRD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXCEL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:10CV1119 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Regarding ECF No. 107] Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., recommending, pursuant to the jointly filed Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 101), the dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against Dexter Automatic Products Company; Kohler Co.; Active Exhaust Corp.; Engineered Fastener Company, Individually and d/b/a EFC International; and The Gates Corporation, aka The Gates Rubber Company, without prejudice.1 ECF No. 107. The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to object within this time waives a party’s right to appeal the district court’s judgment. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Absent objection, a district court may adopt a magistrate judge’s report without review. See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149. 1 The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., for general pretrial supervision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and Local Rule 73.1. ECF No. 55. (4:10cv1119) In the instant case, the parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is supported by the record, and agrees with the recommendation to the voluntary dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims against the above named Defendants. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Baughman’s Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 107. The claims against Defendants Dexter Automatic Products Company; Kohler Co.; Active Exhaust Corp.; Engineered Fastener Company, Individually and d/b/a EFC International; and The Gates Corporation, aka The Gates Rubber Company are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 14, 2011 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?