Carmona v. Bharara et al
Filing
11
Memorandum Opinion and Order The Court grants Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider. The Court re-opens the case and accepts the submittal of the Financial Application.Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 10/5/2012. (S,L)
PEARSON, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
BENHUR CARMONA,
Plaintiff,
v.
HONORABLE PREET BHARARA, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 4:12cv776
JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND
ORDER [Regarding ECF Nos. 9, 10]
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Court’s Order
filed on June 6, 2012. ECF No. 9. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s
Motion to Reconsider and re-opens the case.
I.
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on March 30, 2012. ECF No. 1. On April 11, the Court
ordered Plaintiff to either pay the full filing fee or complete and submit the accompanying
Financial Application within 30 days. ECF No. 2. On April 18, Plaintiff filed an unidentified
form. ECF No. 3.
On June 6, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint because he did not pay the filing fee
or complete and submit a Financial Application. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff timely filed a Motion to
Reconsider (ECF No. 9) and then filed the completed Financial Application (ECF No. 10).
Plaintiff explained he does not understand English well and a friend helping him with his original
filings told him to file the unidentified form. ECF Nos. 9 at 1; 10 at 2.
II.
(4:12cv776)
The Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider. The Court re-opens the case and
accepts the submittal of the Financial Application.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 5, 2012
Date
/s/ Benita Y. Pearson
Benita Y. Pearson
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?