Bey v. Brown et al.

Filing 29

Memorandum Opinion and Order Plaintiffs 5 Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is denied as moot. Defendants Bruce Daryl, Keith Anderson, Denmar Dixon, and Gary Tilletts 17 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim is denied without prejudice. Defendants Ronald M. Faris acting as President, CEO and Michael R. Bourque, Jr. acting as CFO of Ocwen Financial Corporations 21 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is denied without prejudice. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 7/22/2016. (E,CK)

PEARSON, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
SAKINA MAYSAN BEY,
fka Sheila M. Hayes,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY J. BROWN, etc., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:16CV0267

JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
[Resolving ECF Nos. 5, 17, and 21]

Pending are (1) Plaintiff’s Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees
(ECF No. 5), (2) Defendants Bruce Daryl, Keith Anderson, Denmar Dixon, and Gary Tillett’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a
Claim (ECF No. 17), and (3) Defendants Ronald M. Faris acting as President, CEO and Michael
R. Bourque, Jr. acting as CFO of Ocwen Financial Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 21). The Court has been advised, having
reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below,
the Court denies Plaintiff’s amended application as moot and denies these motions to dismiss
without prejudice.
I. Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees
Plaintiff filed an Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF No.
5) on February 5, 2016. On March 7, 2016, the Clerk collected $400.00 from Plaintiff for the

(4:16CV0267)
payment of fees. See Receipt number 44660003924. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff’s
amended application as moot.
II. Motions to Dismiss
Defendants Bruce Daryl, Keith Anderson, Denmar Dixon, Gary Tillett, and Ronald M.
Faris acting as President, CEO and Michael R. Bourque, Jr. acting as CFO of Ocwen Financial
Corporation move the Court for an Order dismissing the Complaint (ECF No. 1). These
motions, however, are directed at the Complaint (ECF No. 1), which was superseded by the
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20). See Clark v. Johnston, 413 Fed.Appx. 804, 811 (6th Cir.
2011) (citing 6 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1476
(3d ed. 2010) (stating that “[a] pleading that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the
pleading it modifies” and that “[o]nce an amended pleading is interposed, the original pleading
no longer performs any function in the case”); see also Drake v. City of Detroit, Michigan, 266
Fed.Appx. 444, 448 (6th Cir. 2008) (stating that a prior “complaint is a nullity, because an
amended complaint [supersedes] all prior complaints”).
Therefore, Defendants Bruce Daryl, Keith Anderson, Denmar Dixon, Gary Tillett, and
Ronald M. Faris acting as President, CEO and Michael R. Bourque, Jr. acting as CFO of Ocwen
Financial Corporation’s motions are denied without prejudice because they are moot due to the
filing of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20). See Calvert v. GNC Corp., No. 4:13CV1697
(N.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2013) (Pearson, J.).
III. Conclusion

2

(4:16CV0267)
Plaintiff’s Amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF No. 5) is
denied as moot.
Defendants Bruce Daryl, Keith Anderson, Denmar Dixon, and Gary Tillett’s Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (ECF
No. 17) is denied without prejudice. Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 25) remains pending.
Defendants Ronald M. Faris acting as President, CEO and Michael R. Bourque, Jr. acting
as CFO of Ocwen Financial Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 21) is denied without prejudice. Their Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (ECF
No. 26) remains pending.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 22, 2016
Date

/s/ Benita Y. Pearson
Benita Y. Pearson
United States District Judge

3