Turner v. Dimon et al

Filing 3

Memorandum of Opinion and Order Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2 , is granted and, for the reasons set forth herein, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/31/2016. (JLG)

Download PDF
PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VERNON LAMONT TURNER, Plaintiff, v. JAMIE DIMON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:16cv609 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 2] Pro se Plaintiff Vernon Turner brings this action against the following JP Morgan Chase Bank officers and employees: Jamie Dimon, Marianne Lake, William Scudder, Tasha Crohurst, Taylor Kimmins, and Garen C. Britt. ECF No. 1. The Complaint is difficult to understand, containing barely intelligible fact allegations and legal claims. It appears, however, that Plaintiff is challenging the enforceability of a promissory note and a security agreement concerning a Cadillac Escalade he purchased. E.g., ECF No. 1-1 at PageID #: 18. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff’s motion is granted, but for the reasons that follow, the action is dismissed. Even when the complaint is liberally construed, it does not reflect a plausible basis on which this Court might exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claim. This case is, therefore, subject to summary dismissal. Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 479 (6th Cir. 1999); Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536–37 (1974) (citing numerous Supreme Court cases for the proposition that attenuated or unsubstantial claims divest the district court of jurisdiction); In re Bendectin (4:16cv609) Litig., 857 F.2d 290, 300 (6th Cir.1988) (recognizing that federal question jurisdiction is divested by unsubstantial claims). Accordingly, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 31, 2016 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?