State of Ohio et al v. Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. et al

Filing 163

Report and Recommendation: It is recommended that the Court enter an order that all cross-claims asserted by all defendants are dismissed with prejudice, and that each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees in connection with the referenced cross-claims. Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 2/18/09. (S,AA)

Download PDF
State of Ohio et al v. Industrial Excess Landfill, Inc. et al Doc. 163 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL, INC., ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:89CV1988 JUDGE PETER C. ECONOMUS Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert __________________________________________________ STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:91CV2559 Plaintiffs v. INDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL, INC., ET AL., Defendants. JUDGE PETER C. ECONOMUS Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 24, 2008, the Honorable Peter C. Economus referred the above-captioned matters for resolution of cross-claims between the defendants. ECF Dkt. #6581. On December 9, 2008, the undersigned conducted a mediation to resolve the cross-claims, where Attorneys Carter 1 Electronic Case Filing references correspond to Case No. 5:89CV1988. Dockets.Justia.com E. Strang, Gary Justis, Matthew Yackshaw, and Peter P. Stinson, as well as Charles Kittinger, pro se, were in attendance. The parties agreed to settle their remaining cross-claims against each other by agreeing to a dismissal with prejudice of any cross-claim and/or appeal they have filed. The undersigned memorialized this agreement in the Minutes of Proceedings of that same date. As of today, however, the above-referenced cross-claims remain outstanding. Accordingly, Judge Economus has renewed his referral for resolution of all remaining cross-claims. ECF Dkt. #671. Pursuant to the agreement reached by the parties at the December 9, 2008 mediation and memorialized in the Minutes of the same, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Court enter an Order that: 1) all cross-claims asserted by all defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and 2) each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees in connection with the above-referenced cross-claims. s/ George J. Limbert GEORGE J. LIMBERT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE: February 18, 2009 ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within ten (10) days of service of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time WAIVES the right to appeal the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?