Anderson v. Bradshaw

Filing 28

Judgment Entry that the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted and the petition is dismissed in its entirety. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a) (3), that an appe al from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c); Fed. R. App. P. 22 (b). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 3/31/2010. (Related doc 1 , 14 , 23 , 27 )(B,B)

Anderson v. Bradshaw

Doc. 28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

WILLIAM L. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BRADSHAW, Respondent.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 5:09 CV 671

JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, the Report and Recommendation (Docket #23) is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent (Docket #14) is hereby GRANTED. The Petition (Docket #1) is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); FED. R. APP. P. 22(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Donald C. Nugent DONALD C. NUGENT United States District Judge DATED: March 31, 2010

Dockets.Justia.com