Stephens v. City of Akron et al

Filing 48

Judgment Entry that for the reasons contained in the Memorandum Opinion and Order 47 filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, it is Ordered that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is Granted in part and Denied inpart. The defendant City of Akron is Granted summary judgment on all claims against it. However, defendants Michael Miles' and Joseph Sidoti's motion for summary judgment is Denied. The claims against officers Sidoti and Miles remain pending and shall proceed. The Court will conduct a status conference in this case on September 17, 2010 at 12:00 noon for the purpose of scheduling a trial date. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 7/26/2010. (M,De)

Stephens v. City of Akron et al

Doc. 48

DOWD, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Seata Stephens, Plaintiff, v. City of Akron, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:09 CV 682 JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons contained in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The defendant City of Akron is GRANTED summary judgment on all claims against it. However, defendants Michael Miles' and Joseph Sidoti's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The claims against officers Sidoti and Miles remain pending and shall proceed. The Court will conduct a status conference in this case on September 17, 2010 at 12:00 noon for the purpose of scheduling a trial date. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 26, 2010 Date /s/ David D. Dowd, Jr. David D. Dowd, Jr. U.S. District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com