Banez v. Howard
Filing
3
Judgment Entry: This Court having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion in this case, it is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed 2 . Further, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/28/09. (B,IE)
<![CDATA[
Banez v. Howard
Doc. 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
RAMON V. BANEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. HOWARD, Judge, Stark County Court of Common Pleas, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 5:09 CV 1100 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER JUDGMENT ENTRY
This Court having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion in this case, it is therefore ORDERED that this action is dismissed. Further, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.
/s/Dan Aaron Polster 5/28/09 DAN AARON POLSTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
