Suiste v. Miller et al

Filing 4

Judgment Entry that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a) (3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. 2253. Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 7/28/2009. (Related doc 3 )(B,B)

Download PDF
Suiste v. Miller et al Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO RAYMOND SUISTE, Petitioner, v. MICHELE MILLER, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:09 CV 1193 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER JUDGMENT ENTRY This Court having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion in this case, it is therefore ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. 2253. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. /s/Dan Aaron Polster 7/28/09 DAN AARON POLSTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?