Nussbaum et al v. Technical International Supply Corp. et al

Filing 77

Judgment Entry that for the reasons contained in the 76 Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously herewith, the Third Party Plaintiffs Millennium Colorworks, Inc.'s and Technical International Supply Corp. dba Technica l Tattoo Supply & Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s motion for default judgment against Third Party Defendant RGD Enterprises, Inc., is GRANTED as to contribution in the amount of $32,000, and DENIED as to attorney fees and expenses (indemnificat ion). Third Party Defendant RGD Enterprises, Inc. is directed to pay forthwith the sum of $32,000 to Third Party Plaintiffs Millennium Colorworks, Inc. and Technical International Supply Corp. dba Technical Tattoo Supply & Manufacturing Co., Inc. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 10/26/2012. (M,De)

Download PDF
DOWD, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Tiffani Nussbaum, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Technical International Supply Corp., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:11 CV 2322 JUDGMENT ENTRY For the reasons contained in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Third Party Plaintiffs Millennium Colorworks, Inc.’s and Technical International Supply Corp. dba Technical Tattoo Supply & Manufacturing Co., Inc.’s motion for default judgment against Third Party Defendant RGD Enterprises, Inc., is GRANTED as to contribution in the amount of $32,000, and DENIED as to attorney fees and expenses (indemnification). Third Party Defendant RGD Enterprises, Inc. is directed to pay forthwith the sum of $32,000 to Third Party Plaintiffs Millennium Colorworks, Inc. and Technical International Supply Corp. dba Technical Tattoo Supply & Manufacturing Co., Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 26, 2012 Date s/ David D. Dowd, Jr. David D. Dowd, Jr. U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?