Yoder v. Tibbals
Order Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been received. This Court dismisses the Petition with prejudice. Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/31/2014. (D,L)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case No. 5:13 CV 118
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
-vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY
Terry A. Tibbals,
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge
filed July 15, 2014 (Doc. 20). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Yoder’s Petition as
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at
which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which
objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute
constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d
976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Petitioner’s deadline for filing objections has passed, and no request for an extension has been
received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety.
Accordingly, this Court dismisses the Petition with prejudice. This Court further certifies that an
appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and declines to issue a certificate of
appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
July 31, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?