Barclay v. Tibbles

Filing 32

Judgment Entry: The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 31 . Judge Sara Lioi on 5/1/2019. (P,G)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MARK BARCLAY, ) ) ) PETITIONER, ) ) v. ) ) ) TERRY TIBBLES, Warden, ) ) ) RESPONDENT. ) CASE NO. 5:13-cv-124 JUDGE SARA LIOI JUDGMENT ENTRY For the reasons set forth in contemporaneously filed memorandum opinion, the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2019 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?