Barclay v. Tibbles
Filing
32
Judgment Entry: The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). re 31 . Judge Sara Lioi on 5/1/2019. (P,G)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
MARK BARCLAY,
)
)
)
PETITIONER, )
)
v.
)
)
)
TERRY TIBBLES, Warden,
)
)
)
RESPONDENT. )
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-124
JUDGE SARA LIOI
JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons set forth in contemporaneously filed memorandum opinion, the petition for
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. Further, the Court certifies that an
appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which
to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 1, 2019
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?