Kalb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
16
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation (re 15 ), the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/26/2014. (D,I)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
GALE KALB,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-1128
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KATHLEEN BURKE
MEMORANDUM
OPINION AND ORDER
On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under
Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they
request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of
Plaintiff. Doc. 15 (“Joint Stipulation”). The parties stipulate that:
Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before an
ALJ, where Plaintiff may testify and present additional arguments and evidence. The ALJ
will further evaluate the claimant’s credibility, address the opinions from the Veteran’s
Administration and address the discrepancies between the opinions of the state agency
reviewing physicians. The ALJ will also consider whether additional testimony from
medical or vocational experts is necessary. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential
evaluation process as needed to reach a de novo decision.
Doc. 15.
Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation, the Court hereby remands the case
for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor
of Plaintiff.
Dated: November 26, 2014
____________________________________
Kathleen B. Burke
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?