Kalb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 16

Memorandum Opinion and Order: Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation (re 15 ), the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/26/2014. (D,I)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO GALE KALB, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:14-CV-1128 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN BURKE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Doc. 15 (“Joint Stipulation”). The parties stipulate that: Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before an ALJ, where Plaintiff may testify and present additional arguments and evidence. The ALJ will further evaluate the claimant’s credibility, address the opinions from the Veteran’s Administration and address the discrepancies between the opinions of the state agency reviewing physicians. The ALJ will also consider whether additional testimony from medical or vocational experts is necessary. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential evaluation process as needed to reach a de novo decision. Doc. 15. Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation, the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Dated: November 26, 2014 ____________________________________ Kathleen B. Burke United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?