K. et al v. Hudson City School Board of Education
Filing
24
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation re 23 of the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner's motion for judgment on the administrate record is denied. This matter is closed. Judge John R. Adams on 9/28/15. (K,C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
J.K., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
-vsHudson City School Board of Education,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 5:14CV1985
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
On September 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a report and
recommendation (Doc. 23) recommending that the Court DENY Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment
on the administrative record and affirm the decisions made by numerous administrative officials.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. No one has raised any objections. Any further review by
this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v.
Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505
(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the administrate record is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ assignments
of error are overruled and the decisions of the independent hearing officer and state level review
officer are affirmed. This matter is hereby closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 28, 2015
/s/ John R. Adams_______________
JOHN R. ADAMS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?