Ashley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
32
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation (re 31 ) of the Magistrate Judge. The decision of the administrative law judge is affirmed. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 12/9/16. (K,C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIAM ERIC ASHLEY,
Plaintiff,
-vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 5:15CV921-JRA
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance
benefits in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the administrative law
judge’s (“ALJ”) decision, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker for
preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule
72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 31) that this
Court affirm the decision of the ALJ and dismiss Plaintiff’s case in its entirety with prejudice.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. To date, no objections have been filed. Any further
review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources.
Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932
F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
1
Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The decision of the administrative law judge is AFFIRMED and the underlying matter is
DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 9, 2016
/s/ John R. Adams_______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?