Cassell v. Gray

Filing 3

Order: The Petition is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, without prejudice to refiling upon exhaustion of state court remedies. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Fed. R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Judge James G. Carr on 4/18/18. (C,D)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Richard Ryan Cassell, Case No. 5:17 CV 2622 Petitioner v. ORDER Warden David W. Gray, Respondent On December 18, 2017, Petitioner pro se Richard Ryan Cassell filed the above-captioned action for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Cassell seeks to challenge his convictions, in the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, for gross sexual imposition and disseminating matter harmful to juveniles. A federal court may entertain a habeas petition filed by a person in state custody only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). In addition, a petitioner must have exhausted all available state remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). It is evident on the face of the Petition that Cassell has not yet sought review of his convictions in the Ohio Supreme Court. ECF Doc #1-2. Such review may be available, see Ohio Sup.Ct.R.P. 7.01(A)(4)(a), and must be sought in order to exhaust state court remedies. Rust v. Zent, 17 F.3d 155, 160 (6th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, without prejudice to refiling upon exhaustion of state court remedies. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Fed. R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2253. So ordered. s/James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?