Landrum v. Mitchell, et al

Filing 244

RECOMMITTAL ORDER re 243 Objection to Report and Recommendations- Petitioner is allowed to file a reply, which is due not later than September 27, 2012. The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be m ore appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge withinstructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and any response and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 09/11/12. (pb1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
LAWRENCE LANDRUM,
Petitioner,

:

Case No. 1:96 CV 641

- vs -

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

CARL S. ANDERSON, Warden,
Respondent.

:

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Respondent=s Objections (Doc. No. 243) to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 240). Petitioner is allowed to file a
reply, which is due not later than September 27, 2012.
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly,

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and any response and making
recommendations based on that analysis.
September 11, 2012.

THOMAS M. ROSE
__________________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

1