Carter v. Mitchell

Filing 167

RECOMMITTAL ORDER - re 163 and 166 - The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/13/13. (kje1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
CEDRIC CARTER,
:
Petitioner,

Case No. 1:98-cv-853
:

-vs-

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

BETTY MITCHELL, Warden,
:
Respondent.

RECOMMITTAL ORDER
This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. No.
166) to the Magistrate Judge’s Post-Remand Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 163).
Respondent is permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 to file a response, but has not yet done so.
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly,

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making
recommendations based on that analysis.
February 13, 2013.

*s/Thomas M. Rose

______________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge