Raglin v. Mitchell

Filing 205

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 204 Report and Recommendation; Petitioner's 39th and 4th grounds for relief are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/3/14. (ba1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Walter Raglin, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:00cv767 Betty Mitchell, Warden, Judge Michael R. Barrett Respondent. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on February 10, 2014 (Doc. 204). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 204) in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 204) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 204) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Petitioner’s thirty-ninth (39) and fortieth (40) grounds for relief are DISMISSED without prejudice AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?