USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al
Filing
587
ORDER that claimant Darlene Hughe's 527 Request for Another Review is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/12/2012. (art)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Plaintiffs
Case No. 1:02-cv-1 07
Spiegel, J.
Litkovitz, M.J.
vs
BOARD OF HAMILTON COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, et al.,
Defendants
ORDER RE: REQUEST
FOR ANOTHER REVIEW BY
DARLENE HUGHES
This matter is before the Court on the "Request for Another Review" of the Water-inBasement ("WIB") claim by Darlene Hughes. (Doc. 527). This is Ms. Hughes' third request
seeking compensatory damages from the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati
("MSD") for basement flooding in December 2008. (See Docs. 424, 506, 527).
On May 28,2010, Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan denied Ms. Hughes' claim,
finding that neither MSD nor the City of Cincinnati was responsible for the water damages to the
subject property. (Doc. 438). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Ms. Hughes
subsequent appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 498).
Ms. Hughes then filed another request for review in the district court. (Doc. 506). The
undersigned construed Ms. Hughes' request as a motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge
Hogan's decision and denied the motion as without merit. (Doc. 515).
In the instant request for review, Ms. Hughes fails to allege facts or present evidence
suggesting that reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Hogan's previous Order denying her claim is
warranted. See Meekison v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction, 181 F.R.D. 571, 572
(S.D. Ohio 1998). Therefore, the Court denies Ms. Hughes' "Request for Another Review."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
~~~
Karen L. Litkovitz, Magistrate Judg
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?