Briggs v. Village of Greenhills Ohio

Filing 71

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 20) is granted; Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is denied; Defendants Motions for Sanctions (Docs. 29, 51) are denied; Defendants motion to amend scheduling order (Doc. 37) is denied as moot; Plaintiffs motions at Docs. 13, 18, 38, 50, 54, 55, 57, 61, 63, and 68 are all denied as moot; Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his appeal (Doc. 59) is denied. This action is closed.. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/2/2007. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (ba, ) Attachment # 2 Certified Mail Return Receipt added on 5/10/2007 (sfe1, ).

Download PDF
Briggs v. Village of Greenhills Ohio Doc. 71 Case 1:05-cv-00044-MRB-TSH Document 71 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Joel Briggs, Plaintiff, v. Village of Green Hills Ohio, Defendant. Case No. 1:05cv044 Judge Michael R. Barrett ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed April 16, 2007 (Doc. 70). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 20) is granted; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is denied; Defendant's Motions for Sanctions (Docs. 29, 51) are denied; Defendant's motion to amend scheduling order (Doc. 37) is denied as moot; Plaintiff's motions at Docs. 13, 18, 38, 50, 54, 55, 57, 61, 63, and 68 are all denied as moot; Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his appeal (Doc. 59) is denied. This action is closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court bac May 2, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?