CNG Financial Corporation v. Google Inc
Filing
86
STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Plaintiff CNG Financial Corporation and Defendant Google Inc. (Hunter, Barry) Modified docket text on 9/7/2007 (scot1, ).
CNG Financial Corporation v. Google Inc
Doc. 86
Case 1:06-cv-00040-SSB-TSB
Document 86
Filed 09/07/2007
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
CNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Case No. 1 :06-cv-040
Plaintiff/CounterclaimDefendant,
vs.
Chief Judge Sandra S. Beckwith Magistrate Timothy S. Black
GOOGLE INC.
Defendant/Counterclaim- :
STIPULA TION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff.
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant CNG Financial Corporation ("CNG") and Defendant and
Counter-Plaintiff Google Inc. ("Google") hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The parties agree that all ofCNG's claims against Google will be dismissed with
prejudice.
2. In light of the foregoing dismissal with prejudice and other factual developments,
the parties agree that Google's claims are moot, and therefore stipulate to their dismissal as moot.
3. The parties further agree that each of them shall bear its own attorneys' fees and
costs in this litigation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
Isl Barry D. Hunter Ann Gallagher Robinson Frost Brown Todd, LLC 2200 PNC Center 201 East Fifth Street
Cincinnati,OH 45202-4182
Tel. (513) 651-6800
Fax: (513) 651-6981
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-00040-SSB-TSB
Document 86
Filed 09/07/2007
Page 2 of 2
Barry D. Hunter Medrith Lee Norman Frost Brown Todd LLC 250 West Main Street, Suite 2700 Lexington, Kentucky 40507 (859) 231-0000 (859) 231-001 I-fax
Attorneys for CNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Isl Michael H. Page (with permission) Michael H. Page, Esq. Klaus H. Hamm, Esq. Keker & Van Nest LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94107
Kenneth F. Seibel, Esq. Jacobs, Kleinman, Seibel & McNally 2300 Kroger Building 1014 Vine Street Cincinnati, OH 45202
Attorneys for Google Inc.
LEXLibrary 0102393.0533475 343797v.1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?