Fitzpatrick v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

Filing 139

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL - It is accordingly ORDERED that Messrs. Schuster and Vanderlaans request to withdraw is GRANTED, effective as of the date of this Order. Deborah Williams, Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Ohio, is hereby appointed as counsel for Petitioner and requested to assign two or more attorneys from the Capital Habeas Unit as counsel to Mr. Fitzpatrick. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/28/2016. (kpf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI STANLEY FITZPATRICK, : Petitioner, Case No. 1:06-cv-356 : -vs- District Judge Susan J. Dlott Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, : Respondent. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court upon further consideration of correspondence from attorney James Schuster regarding his and attorney VanderLaan’s representation of Petitioner (ECF No. 137, 138). It appears from lack of notice from Mr. Schuster that he has been unable to resolve the difficulties in this representation which are being kept confidential to protect attorney-client privilege. Because Petitioner has been assigned an execution date, the Court cannot further delay in resolving these difficulties. It is accordingly ORDERED that Messrs. Schuster and Vanderlaan’s request to withdraw is GRANTED, effective as of the date of this Order. Deborah Williams, Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Ohio, is hereby appointed as counsel for Petitioner and requested to assign two or more attorneys from the Capital Habeas Unit as counsel to Mr. Fitzpatrick. Those attorneys should enter their appearances and assume the obligations of representation forthwith. March 28, 2016. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge Copy: Deborah Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?