Fitzpatrick v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Filing
139
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL - It is accordingly ORDERED that Messrs. Schuster and Vanderlaans request to withdraw is GRANTED, effective as of the date of this Order. Deborah Williams, Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Ohio, is hereby appointed as counsel for Petitioner and requested to assign two or more attorneys from the Capital Habeas Unit as counsel to Mr. Fitzpatrick. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/28/2016. (kpf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
STANLEY FITZPATRICK,
:
Petitioner,
Case No. 1:06-cv-356
:
-vs-
District Judge Susan J. Dlott
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden,
:
Respondent.
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING
NEW COUNSEL
This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court upon further consideration of
correspondence from attorney James Schuster regarding his and attorney VanderLaan’s
representation of Petitioner (ECF No. 137, 138). It appears from lack of notice from Mr.
Schuster that he has been unable to resolve the difficulties in this representation which are being
kept confidential to protect attorney-client privilege. Because Petitioner has been assigned an
execution date, the Court cannot further delay in resolving these difficulties.
It is accordingly ORDERED that Messrs. Schuster and Vanderlaan’s request to withdraw
is GRANTED, effective as of the date of this Order. Deborah Williams, Federal Public Defender
for the Southern District of Ohio, is hereby appointed as counsel for Petitioner and requested to
assign two or more attorneys from the Capital Habeas Unit as counsel to Mr. Fitzpatrick. Those
attorneys should enter their appearances and assume the obligations of representation forthwith.
March 28, 2016.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
Copy: Deborah Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?