Hughbanks v. Hudson
DECISION AND ORDER - the Court DENIES the 133 Motion for Reconsideration on the basis set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Opinion andRecommendations in Waddy v. Coyle, Case No. 3:98-cv-084 (Doc. No. 188). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/11/2012. (sc1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
GARY L. HUGHBANKS, JR.,
Case No. 1:07-cv-111
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
STUART HUDSON, Warden,
DECISION AND ORDER
This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Respondent’s Objection (Doc. No.
133), construed as a motion for reconsideration, to the Court’s Decision and Order (Doc. No. 131)
granting Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 124). Petitioner has filed a Response to the
Objection (Doc. No. 136) and Respondent has filed a Reply in Support (Doc. No. 137).
Having considered the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES the Motion for
Reconsideration on the basis set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Supplemental Opinion and
Recommendations in Waddy v. Coyle, Case No. 3:98-cv-084 (Doc. No. 188).
July 11, 2012.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?