Hughbanks v. Hudson

Filing 68

AMENDMENT TO ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - In this capital habeas corpus case, the Order appointing counsel refers to the Petitioner's qualification for appointed counsel under 21 U.S.C. § 848(q). As of March 9, 2006, that statute was replaced with 18 U.S.C. § 3599. The Court finds that the Petitioner is qualified for appointed counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599 and the appointment of counsel heretofore made shall be deemed to have been made under the newer statute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/14/2009. (kopf1, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON IN RE Capital Habeas Corpus Litigation, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz AMENDMENT TO ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL In each of the following capital habeas corpus cases, the Order appointing counsel refers to the Petitioner's qualification for appointed counsel under 21 U.S.C. 848(q). As of March 9, 2006, that statute was replaced with 18 U.S.C. 3599. The Court finds that each of the Petitioners in the following cases is qualified for appointed counsel under 18 U.S.C. 3599 and the appointments of counsel heretofore made in these cases shall be deemed to have been made under the newer statute. 1:07-cv-111 2:07-cv-595 2:07-cv-846 1:07-cv-776 3:07-cv-345 3:08-cv-076 Hughbanks v. Hudson Turner v. Hudson Hand v. Houk Elmore v. Houk Conway v. Houk Bays v. Warden The Clerk shall docket this Order in each of the above-captioned cases. April 14, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?