Ramey v. Collins et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by all Defendants and 43 NOTICE of Filing Defendants' Corrected doc. 27 Motion for Summary Judgment by all Defendants. This matter is closed. An appeal on any Order adopting this R&R would not be taken in 'good faith'. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 3/6/09. (mr1, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/6/2009: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mr1, ).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Carl Ramey, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Terry Collins, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07cv740 Judge Michael R. Barrett ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on February 6, 2009 (Doc. 44). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment (Doc. 43) is GRANTED. This matter is closed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in "good faith." See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.2d 601 (65h Cir.1997) IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?