Kier v. United States of America et al
OPINION AND ORDER granting 23 Motion to Substitute Defendant United States of America as the Proper Party Defendant with Respect to the Common Law Tort Claims Asserted against Defendant Paula S. Pfeffer. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/10/2009. (km1, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :
KENNETH G. KIER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the unopposed Motion of Defendant, United States of America, to be substituted as the Proper Party Defendant with Respect to Claims Asserted against Defendant Paula S. Pfeffer (doc. 23). For the reasons indicated
herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion. On September 25, 2008, Plaintiff, Kenneth G. Kier, filed this matter, asserting common law tort claims against Defendants United States of America and others (doc. 1). On October 23, 2008, Plaintiff amended his complaint, naming Paula S. Pfeffer
("Pfeffer") as co-Defendant (doc. 7).
Plaintiff alleges that
Pfeffer negligently injured him while she performed her duties delivering mail as an employee of the United States Postal Service (Id.). Defendant United States of America now moves for
substitution as proper party Defendant with respect to the claims asserted against Pfeffer (doc. 23).
Compensation Act of 1988, 28 U.S.C. 2679 ("Westfall Act"), mandates substitution of the United States of America as proper party with respect to claims asserted against federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. 28 U.S.C. 2679(b)(1). The Westfall Act establishes a procedure for the Attorney General, through the United States Attorneys, to determine whether federal employees have acted within the scope of their employment. 2679(d)(1), 28 C.F.R. § 15.3(a). within the scope of employment, 28 U.S.C §
If a federal employee acted the United Id. States Attorney
certifies this fact to the District Court. the Attorney General is prima facie
evidence that a federal
employee acted within the scope of her employment. Henson v. NASA, 14 F.3d 1143, 1147 (6th Cir. 1994) ("substitution will be granted upon the certification of the Attorney General that the employee was acting within the scope of employment"). In its Motion, the United States Attorney for the
Southern District of Ohio certifies that Defendant Pfeffer acted within the scope of her employment during the events in question (doc. 23). Plaintiff does not contest this certification. Accordingly, the Court finds it appropriate to GRANT Defendant United States of America's Motion (doc. 23), and to SUBSTITUTE Defendant United States of America as proper party Defendant with respect to claims asserted against Defendant Paula 2
Henson, 14 F.3d 1143, 1147.
SO ORDERED. Dated: February 10, 2009 /s/ S. Arthur Spiegel ___________ S. Arthur Spiegel United States Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?