Leonard v. Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary

Filing 23

BRIEFING ORDER ON DISCOVERY - Having read Respondent's Renewed Motion for Reconsideration, the Court agrees it is proper to consider Respondent's arguments on the merits of discovery. Accordingly, Petitioner shall treat the renewed Motion as if it were a memorandum in opposition to the Motion for Discovery and shall file a reply memorandum not later than June 25, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/9/2010. (kpf1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
PATRICK LEONARD, : Petitioner, : -vsWARDEN, Ohio State Penitentiary, : Respondent. Case No. 1:09-cv-056 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

BRIEFING ORDER ON DISCOVERY

Having read Respondent's Renewed Motion for Reconsideration, the Court agrees it is proper to consider Respondent's arguments on the merits of discovery. Accordingly, Petitioner shall treat the renewed Motion as if it were a memorandum in opposition to the Motion for Discovery and shall file a reply memorandum not later than June 25, 2010. June 9, 2010.
s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge

-1-