Johnson v. State of Ohio Employees and Employer's of Ohio Department Rehabilitation Correction et al

Filing 12

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that 10 Report and Recommendations be, and is hereby ADOPTED; that the plaintiffs complaint be,and is hereby DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE; that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this court's order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by William O. Bertelsman on 1/22/10. (mr1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/22/2010: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt DN 12 & 13 sent) (mr1). Modified docket text on 1/25/2010 (eh1).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALONZO JOHNSON, JR., PLAINTIFF VS. STATE OF OHIO EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYER'S OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al., DEFENDANTS This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10), and there being no objections filed thereto, and the court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that said Report and Recommendation be, and it is, hereby adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court; that the plaintiff's complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed, with prejudice, for lack of prosecution; that the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that for the reasons contained in said Report and Recommendation that an appeal of this court's Order would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997). This 22nd day of January, 2010. ORDER Case No. 1:09-cv-633 Bertelsman, J. Hogan, M.J.