Dickess v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/15/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (ba1)
Dickess v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Doc. 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Dickess, Petitioner, v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution, Respondent. Case No. 1:09cv635 Judge Michael R. Barrett
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 24, 2010 (Doc. 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability and in forma pauperis status will not be issued/granted consistent with the Opinion by the Magistrate Judge as outlined in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9). IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?