Buchanan v. Hamilton County Sheriff Dep

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, 18 Motion for leave to amend the complaint denied insofar as he seeks to clarify the claims in the original complaint and granted as to his request to add a jury demand. Plaintiff's 33 Motion for leave to amend the complaint is denied. (wam1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Michael Buchanan, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Hamilton County Sheriff Department, et al.,
Defendant(s).

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 1:10cv503
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Karen L. Litkovitz filed on March 4, 2011 (Doc. 36), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such
objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired April 21, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and
Recommendation.
Plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation until April 21, 2011. At no time were objections filed.
Accordingly, plaintiff Buchanan’s motion for leave to amend the complaint (Doc. 18) is
DENIED insofar as he seeks to clarify the claims in the original complaint and GRANTED as to his
request to add a jury demand.
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint (Doc. 33) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court