Sykes et al v. Veterans Administration et al

Filing 113

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 107); AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE RECORD ON APPEAL (Doc. 105). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/9/11. (mr1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
SANDY SYKES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 1:11-cv-688
Judge Timothy S. Black
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE (Doc. 107); AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY
THE RECORD ON APPEAL (Doc. 105)
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United
States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate
Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on November 21, 2011,
submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 107). Subsequently, Plaintiff filed an
Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc.109) and Defendant filed a Response
to Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 111).
As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has
reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all
of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its
entirety.

Accordingly, Plaintiff Sandy Sykes’s Motion to Modify the Record on Appeal
(Doc. 105) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date:

12/9/11

Timothy S. Black
United States District Judge

-2-