Bethel et al v. Middletown City School District

Filing 6

ORDER: The Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to redact the privacy information from the documents submitted by plaintiffs for filing with this Court. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to electronically file the redacted versions of plaintiffs� 39; complaint and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to seal the original complaint and motion and to reflect the sealing of these documents on the docket of the Court. The original complaint and in forma pauperis motion shall be retained under seal until further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/20/11. (mtw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

ORLANDO BETHEL, et al.,
Plaintiffs

Case No. 1:11-cv-206
Dlott, J.

vs
THE MIDDLETOWN CITY
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants

ORDER

Pursuant to the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and the E-Government Act of
2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, filing parties shall omit or partially redact personal data
identifiers from all pleadings, documents and exhibits. Plaintiffs are notified that any further
documents filed with the Court shall omit personal identifiers such as the names of minor
children.
The Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to redact the privacy information from the
documents submitted by plaintiffs for filing with this Court.
The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to electronically file the redacted versions
of plaintiffs’ complaint and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is
DIRECTED to seal the original complaint and motion and to reflect the sealing of these
documents on the docket of the Court. The original complaint and in forma pauperis motion
shall be retained under seal until further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

4/20/2011

s/Karen L. Litkovitz
Karen L. Litkovitz
United States Magistrate Judge