Vaught v. Hartford

Filing 32

ORDER denying 21 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 22 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendation 31 . This case is Remanded to the Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company to complete the administrative review process. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 8/15/12. (do1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

SHEILA VAUGHT,
Plaintiff
v.

C-1-11-227

THE HARTFORD LIFE &
ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant

ORDER
This

matter

is

before

the

Court

upon

the

Report

and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 31) to
which neither party has objected.
Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the
Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly
applied it to the particular facts of this case.

Accordingly, in the

absence of any objection by any party, this Court accepts the Report as
uncontroverted.

2
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
(doc. no. 31) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE.

Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative

Record (doc. no. 21) is DENIED; Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Judgment on
the Administrative Record (doc. no. 22) is DENIED; and this matter is
REMANDED to The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company to
complete the administrative review process.
This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this
Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Herman J. Weber
Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge
United States District Court