Shelton v. Cincinnati, City of et al

Filing 41

ORDER that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any party upon good cause shown within (90) days from the date of this Order, may reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement agreement for the purposes of its enforcement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/19/2012. (art)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT SHELTON, Plaintiff, Case No. 1: 11-cv-381 Litkovitz, M.J. vs. CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants. ORDER The parties have reached a settlement in this matter following a settlement conference held November 19,2012. It is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement agreement for the purposes of its enforcement. IT IS SO ORDERED. Karen L. Litkovitz, agistrate Jud United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?