Garza v. Adams et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23 . Accordingly, pltf's motions for default judgment [11, 12, 13, and 16] are DENIED. The Motions to dismiss [5, 7, and 9] are GRANTED. Pltf's Motion to amend 15 is Denied Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1) Modified docket text on 3/26/2012 (wam1).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Israel Garza, Plaintiff(s), vs. Dennis Adams, et al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:11cv541 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 31, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23). Subsequently, plaintiff, while not filing a pleading titled objections to the Report and Recommendation, has in fact filed documents referring to the Report and Recommendation (Docs. 27, 30 and 31) and defendant, Judge Daniel Gattermeyer, filed a response to the objections of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33). The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motions for default judgment (Docs. 11, 12, 13 and 16) are DENIED. The motions to dismiss by defendants Adams, Guiliano and Gattermeyer (Docs. 5, 7, and 9) are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Doc. 15) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?