Brown v. Danson Inc.
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING 35 Motion to Dismiss and ADOPTING 47 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 26 Motion for a more definite statement, 33 Motion for a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(i) frivolous and Fed. Civ. R. 11(b) evidentiary hearing and 45 Motion for leave to amend the complaint are DENIED. This matter is hereby TERMINATED from the docket. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/22/13. (mtw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/22/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mtw).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Terry Brown,
:
:
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Danson, Inc., dba Aegis Protective Services,
Defendant(s).
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case Number: 1:11cv820
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate
Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings
and filed with this Court on November 20, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47).
Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 48).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered
de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does
determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 35) is GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a more definite statement (Doc.
26), motion for a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(i) frivolous and Fed. Civ. R. 11(b) evidentiary hearing (Doc.
33), and motion for leave to amend the complaint (Doc. 45) are DENIED.
This matter is hereby TERMINATED from the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Susan J. Dlott_____________
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?