Hill v. Cincinnati City of et al
Filing
31
ORDER of CONSOLIDATION with case 1:12cv479. ALL FUTURE FILINGS shall be made in CASE 1:11cv830. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 9/10/12. (jl1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
JUNE HILL,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.1:11-cv-830
vs.
Spiegel, J.
Bowman, M.J.
CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al,
Defendants.
UNITED STATES EX REL.
JUNE HILL & DOES 1-40,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.1:12-cv-479
vs.
Spiegel, J.
Bowman, M.J.
CITY OF CINCINNATI
SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, et al,
Defendants.
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION
Pursuant to this Court’s August 13, 2012 Order, the above-referenced cases are
herein CONSOLIDATED for all purposes under the LOWER DOCKET NUMBER,
1:11-cv-830. Notably, upon a sua sponte review of Case No. 1:12-cv-479, the Court found
that “it appeared that Plaintiff has stated a viable claim of retaliation under 42 U.S.C. §
1983 against defendant Zucker to the extent that plaintiff has alleged facts indicating that
after the filing of a related lawsuit against Zucker and others (see June Hill v. City of
Cincinnati, et al., No. 1:11-cv-830) Zucker took retaliatory actions against her which
included the removal of a permit that affects her means of employment as a taxicab driver.”
(See Case No. 1:12-cv-469, Doc. 6). Thus, that one claim of retaliation should be allowed
to proceed and consolidated with the earlier filed case.
Accordingly, ALL FUTURE FILINGS shall be made in Consolidated Case No.
1:11-cv-830.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Stephanie K. Bowman
Stephanie K. Bowman
United States Magistrate Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?