Hill v. Cincinnati City of et al

Filing 31

ORDER of CONSOLIDATION with case 1:12cv479. ALL FUTURE FILINGS shall be made in CASE 1:11cv830. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 9/10/12. (jl1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JUNE HILL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.1:11-cv-830 vs. Spiegel, J. Bowman, M.J. CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al, Defendants. UNITED STATES EX REL. JUNE HILL & DOES 1-40, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.1:12-cv-479 vs. Spiegel, J. Bowman, M.J. CITY OF CINCINNATI SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, et al, Defendants. ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION Pursuant to this Court’s August 13, 2012 Order, the above-referenced cases are herein CONSOLIDATED for all purposes under the LOWER DOCKET NUMBER, 1:11-cv-830. Notably, upon a sua sponte review of Case No. 1:12-cv-479, the Court found that “it appeared that Plaintiff has stated a viable claim of retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Zucker to the extent that plaintiff has alleged facts indicating that after the filing of a related lawsuit against Zucker and others (see June Hill v. City of Cincinnati, et al., No. 1:11-cv-830) Zucker took retaliatory actions against her which included the removal of a permit that affects her means of employment as a taxicab driver.” (See Case No. 1:12-cv-469, Doc. 6). Thus, that one claim of retaliation should be allowed to proceed and consolidated with the earlier filed case. Accordingly, ALL FUTURE FILINGS shall be made in Consolidated Case No. 1:11-cv-830. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Stephanie K. Bowman Stephanie K. Bowman United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?